This particular post said that theyd revoke the content keys from sellers if they identified who was doing the selling, but it didnt mention anything about banning players who bought the content as they ve discussed in the past. They are the people that took a chance on a campaign that has produced a game that is overall fun.Īnother discussion posted later on advised players not to attempt to purchase the content from third party sites such as eBay, saying that there was no way they could help players if they got scammed. They are for those that backed us and have been with us from the beginning. We made that clear on Day 1 of the Backerkit that these two DLC were for backers both Kickstarter and Backerkit, the Steam post from the developers read, referencing the Savini Jason and a clothing pack. The Savini Jason variation, designed by and named after make-up effects artist Tom Savini, comes with a menacing appearance and some impressive skills, but it looks like the hellish Jason wont ever be resold as future DLC, according to publisher Gun Media. That way the kickstarters get him easy and the rest of the public has to put a little in to get him. You just want to pretend it is because it happens to be yours.Even if the DLC costs a decent amount or you must reach a very high level to obtain him. Let's not act like one assumption is more fact based than the other. You haven't provided 'more evidence' that it will, you just stated an opinion. Presenting the definition of a word doesn't mean you're applying it correctly. Maybe you're right but I see nothing pointing to it being a likely outcome. You think that just because you think that.

Your assumption is that people would be more willing to buy a 40 dollar game because they added a single charactor that they would have to pay 6 extra dollars for. Maybe I'm wrong but that's a reasonable thought process to have with those numbers. The fact that there are a handful out of several hundred thousand owners complaining leads me to believe most don't care. Nothing was 'wild' about anything I said.

My assumption is that adding a $6 dollar add-on isn't going to boost sales. Words have meaning and context is important. Probable - having more evidence for than against, or evidence that inclines the mind to belief but leaves some room for doubt I am presenting a possible solution to a PR problem, based on logic and a regard for positive outcomes for all parties involved while acknowledging no guarantee of said outcomes. The difference is you are presenting wild assumptions as facts. Ursprünglich geschrieben von Jack Rabbit Slim:Now you're just being petty, so let me clarify something then I'm done with this tangent.

Savini jason xbox one 2018 free